10X Business Consulting Ten service areas ₹70K – ₹1.5L per month

Engineer the whole
commercial model.

A sales problem is usually a pricing problem. A pricing problem is usually a positioning problem. A margin problem is usually an operations problem. Treating one area in isolation is how businesses spend years fixing the wrong thing.

These ten areas cover the entire path from how you are positioned to how revenue is collected and repeated. Digital marketing and AI transformation are separate services with their own pricing - these ten are the consulting practice itself.

Before any of this

The diagnostic is free, and it is not a service line.

Evaluation and consulting are deliberately separated. The Revenue Stress Test and the Business Understanding Check cost nothing, sit outside every engagement, and exist to establish which of the ten areas below are actually your constraint. You can take the result and act on it entirely without me. See both diagnostics →

The practice

Ten service areas

Each one is scoped, delivered and measured independently. Tiers are priced by how many run concurrently.

Service 01

Revenue architecture & the 10X roadmap

Turning a number into a plan somebody can execute.

The target is reverse-engineered into quarterly, monthly and weekly numbers, then into the activity volume required to produce them at your actual conversion rates and average ticket size - not an optimistic version of them. Capacity is checked against real headcount and ramp time, so you learn in the planning room whether the number is achievable rather than in month seven.

Where the arithmetic shows the target cannot be reached with the current model, that is the finding. The roadmap then addresses the constraint - ticket size, conversion, capacity or channel - instead of asking the same team to try harder against the same maths.

  • Target decomposition to quarterly, monthly, weekly and per-person
  • Activity model derived from your own stage conversion rates
  • Capacity and hiring plan with ramp curve and break-even per head
  • Base, stretch and downside scenarios with defined trigger points
  • Board-ready plan with every assumption stated and defensible
Supported by - where live tracking is required, the Revenue OS platform is deployed so weekly targets are visible against actuals rather than reconstructed at month end.
How a target becomes behaviourDecomposition model
ANNUAL TARGET ₹12,00,00,000 Q1 · ₹2.4 Cr Q2 · ₹2.8 Cr Q3 · ₹3.2 Cr Q4 · ₹3.6 Cr ₹80L / MONTH ₹93L / MONTH ₹1.07Cr / MO ₹1.2Cr / MONTH THE ACTIVITY THAT PRODUCES IT - AT YOUR OWN CONVERSION RATES CONVERSATIONS1,120/ month QUALIFIED · 34%381/ month PROPOSALS · 41%156/ month . CAPACITY CHECK 42 deals ÷ 6 people = 7 each
Nobody can chase “twelve crore.” Everybody can chase seven deals a month. The decomposition also proves the number before anyone is held to it.
Service 02

Market positioning & offer engineering

Who you sell to, and what you refuse to sell.

Ideal customer profiles are defined by revenue band, decision structure, buying trigger and geography rather than by industry label, and each profile gets its own message, proof points and objection set. Just as importantly, the profiles you should decline are named - because the fastest margin improvement in most businesses is refusing work that was never going to be profitable.

The offer is then engineered around the outcome the buyer is actually purchasing. Businesses that sell deliverables compete on quantity and price. Businesses that sell outcomes compete on credibility, which is a far better position to defend.

  • Ideal customer profiles by size, trigger event and buying unit
  • Disqualification criteria - who you decline, and why
  • Outcome-based offer architecture and proof assets
  • Competitive positioning and differentiation narrative
  • Messaging framework carried consistently across every channel
Who you accept, who you declineQualification model
EVERY ENQUIRY THAT REACHES YOU ICP TEST ACCEPT - 3 PROFILES 62% of revenue · 44% margin CONDITIONAL - 2 PROFILES 27% of revenue · 21% margin DECLINE - 4 PROFILES 11% of revenue · 3% margin WHAT DECLINING BUYS BACK SELLING TIME RECOVERED 31% of the week BLENDED MARGIN 28% → 39% SAME TEAM · SAME MARKET · FEWER CLIENTS
The fastest margin improvement available to most businesses is refusing work that was never going to be profitable. Eleven per cent of revenue leaves. A third of the week comes back.
Service 03

Pricing, packaging & margin strategy

Growth that adds profit, not just turnover.

Services are restructured into tiered, outcome-named packages with explicit inclusions, exclusions and a minimum ticket policy - so the conversation becomes which tier rather than what can be taken out. Ambiguous scope is what erodes margin, delays closing and makes discounting feel inevitable, and it is almost always fixable on paper before it is fixable in a negotiation.

Alongside packaging, margin visibility is installed at line level: which clients, products and channels actually pay, and which are quietly subsidised by the rest. Several engagements have improved profit without adding a rupee of revenue, purely by making that visible.

  • Tiered package design named by outcome, not deliverable count
  • Pricing architecture - retainer, project, hybrid, performance-linked
  • Minimum ticket policy with a written approval matrix for exceptions
  • Line-level margin analysis by client, product and channel
  • Overhead benchmark and cost structure review
  • Proposal, agreement and rate card templates, version-controlled
Flat pricing against tiered pricingPackaging model
ONE PRICE, ENDLESSLY NEGOTIATED 18% MARGIN ₹1,20,000 “what can you take out?” −14% AVG DISCOUNT THREE TIERS, ONE QUESTION: WHICH ONE? 19% ₹85,000 32% ₹1,45,000 44% ₹2,15,000 IGNITE BUILD SCALE MINIMUM TICKET ₹85,000 · EXCEPTIONS NEED WRITTEN APPROVAL SAME 100 DEALS FLAT PRICING ₹1.03 Cr after discounting TIERED ₹1.45 Cr +41% on the same volume
Ambiguous scope is what makes discounting feel inevitable. Tiering moves the conversation from “what can you remove” to “which one” - before a single negotiation starts.
Service 04

Demand strategy & marketing ROI

The strategy layer. Execution is a separate service.

Channel strategy is rebuilt around cost per closure rather than cost per lead, because cost per lead flatters exactly the channels that waste the most sales time. Each source is measured through to closed and collected revenue, and budget is reallocated toward what pays rather than toward what produces the most visible activity.

Where a business is dependent on a single channel - usually referrals or paid ads - the work also includes building the second and third channel deliberately, so growth stops being hostage to one platform, one algorithm or one relationship. This service sets the strategy; execution can be run by your team, your existing agency, or by me.

  • Channel audit with cost per lead, per meeting and per closure
  • Budget reallocation model based on closure economics
  • Channel diversification plan to remove single-source dependency
  • Outbound, inbound, partner and referral motion design
  • Attribution framework from spend through to collected revenue
Executed by - Digital Marketing as a Service, a separate engagement, if you want the strategy delivered rather than handed over.
Why cost per lead liesAttribution model
FOUR CHANNELS, JUDGED TWO WAYS CHANNEL SPEND LEADS COST / LEAD CLOSED COST / CLOSURE Social ads ₹3.0L 840 ₹357 6 ₹50,000 Display ₹1.2L 290 ₹414 3 ₹40,000 Search ₹2.4L 180 ₹1,333 21 ₹11,428 Partner ₹0.6L 44 ₹1,363 14 ₹4,285 JUDGED ON COST PER LEAD Social and display look best. 70% of budget goes there. JUDGED ON COST PER CLOSURE Search and partner produce 80% of revenue on 43% of spend.
Cost per lead flatters exactly the channels that waste the most sales time. The same data read on cost per closure reverses the budget entirely - without spending a rupee more.
Service 05

Sales system & conversion improvement

Removing the variance between one person and another.

The selling process is documented stage by stage with entry and exit criteria, so a deal described as close to closing means the same thing regardless of who is describing it. Discovery frameworks, follow-up sequences and response-time discipline are installed and trained, and the whole process is then enforced rather than merely published.

Most conversion improvement comes from three unglamorous places: responding faster, following up more times, and qualifying harder at the front so closer time is spent on enquiries that can actually convert. This is where the largest single-quarter revenue movements usually come from.

  • Documented sales process with stage entry and exit criteria
  • Discovery, demonstration, follow-up and closing frameworks
  • Response-time standards with priority-based treatment
  • Objection handling library covering the objections you actually hear
  • Win and loss reason coding, reviewed monthly
  • Weekly pipeline review structure with a fixed agenda
Supported by - lead scoring and revenue intelligence where enquiry volume is high, and CRM design, build and governance to make the process enforceable rather than optional.
Where 1,000 enquiries actually goConversion model
UNDOCUMENTED - RESULTS VARY BY PERSON 1,000 enquiries 410 contacted within 24h 160 reached stage two 62 proposals 28 closed · 2.8% 590 NEVER PROPERLY WORKED · NOBODY KNOWS WHICH DOCUMENTED, TRAINED, ENFORCED 1,000 enquiries 910 contacted within 1 hour 470 reached stage two 198 proposals 81 closed · 8.1% <60 MIN RESPONSE · 7-STEP FOLLOW-UP · STAGE EXIT CRITERIA
No extra marketing spend. No new hires. The same thousand enquiries producing 81 closures instead of 28 - because the process is now the same on a bad week as a good one.
Service 06

Channel, partnership & distribution strategy

Growth that does not depend on buying every customer.

Most businesses have exactly one route to market and treat that as normal. It is not - it is concentration risk. When acquisition cost rises on that single route, and it always does, there is nowhere for volume to go and no leverage in the negotiation.

This work designs the routes you do not currently own: channel partners with defined economics, referral and reseller structures, institutional or corporate tie-ups, and the marketplace or aggregator relationships worth having on terms worth signing. Each one is modelled on contribution rather than volume, so a partner who brings turnover but no margin is identified before the agreement rather than after.

  • Route-to-market map with revenue concentration analysis
  • Partner and channel economics - margin share, floor pricing, exclusivity terms
  • Referral and reseller programme design with attribution
  • Institutional, corporate and B2B2C tie-up structuring
  • Aggregator and marketplace terms review
  • Partner onboarding, enablement and performance review cadence
One route against manyDistribution model
SINGLE ROUTE - CONCENTRATION RISK YOUR MARKET YOU ONE ALGORITHM CHANGE = ONE BAD QUARTER DISTRIBUTED - SIX ROUTES, EACH MEASURED YOU REVENUE CONCENTRATION BEFORE - ONE ROUTE 94% from one source AFTER - SIX ROUTES No source above 31% EACH PARTNER MODELLED ON CONTRIBUTION, NOT ON THE VOLUME THEY PROMISE
One route to market is not a strategy, it is exposure. Distribution turns your growth from something you buy into something you own.
Service 07

Team structure, hiring & capability

So output stops depending on two irreplaceable people.

Organisation design, role definitions and the handoff logic between the people who generate, convert and service revenue - including who owns a client at each moment and what triggers the transfer. Hiring scorecards and structured interviews make selection repeatable rather than instinctive, and a documented ramp path gets a new person to useful output in weeks rather than quarters.

Key performance indicators and responsibilities are then tied to compensation, because behaviour follows payout rather than intention. Where a business is over-dependent on one or two individuals, this work is the difference between a company and a collection of talented people.

  • Organisation design - roles, ratios, reporting lines, handoff protocol
  • Hiring scorecards, structured interviews and role-play assessment
  • 30-60-90 day onboarding with certification gates
  • KPI and responsibility frameworks tied to incentive design
  • Documented standard operating procedures, each with a named owner
  • Review cadence - daily, weekly and monthly, with agendas
What a new hire costs before they payRamp model
STRUCTURE & OWNERSHIP HEAD OF SALES BD TELECALL ACCOUNTS EACH ROLE CARRIES SCORECARD - HOW THEY ARE HIRED SOP - HOW THE WORK IS DONE GATE - WHAT PROVES THEY CAN TIME TO FULL PRODUCTIVITY 100%50% DAY 0DAY 60DAY 120DAY 180 DOCUMENTED PATH Useful by day 60 SHADOWING & HOPE Still ramping at day 180
A hire who reaches useful output at day 60 instead of day 180 pays back four extra months of production in their first year - from documentation, not from talent.
Service 08

Operations & delivery efficiency

Closing the gap between sale and collection.

Revenue that has been sold but not delivered is not revenue. The delivery chain is mapped end to end, the handoffs that create delay are removed, and the repetitive layer is automated so capacity stops being a straight function of headcount. Rework and revision cycles - usually caused by unclear scope at the point of sale rather than by delivery failure - are traced back to their real origin.

Cycle time from enquiry to cash is treated as a profit lever in its own right, because a business that collects in thirty days instead of ninety has effectively financed its own growth.

  • End-to-end delivery process map with timing at each stage
  • Handoff protocol between sales and delivery, with documented scope
  • Automation of the repetitive operational layer
  • Rework and revision root-cause analysis
  • Lead-to-cash cycle time reduction plan
  • Capacity model showing where volume breaks the current setup
Where the ninety days actually goCycle-time model
SOLD → DELIVERED → COLLECTED - BEFORE SIGNED SCOPE? HANDOFF BUILD REVISION INVOICE PAID +11d +9d +21d +14d WAITING, NOT WORKING - 55 OF 90 DAYS TOTAL CYCLE 90 DAYS AFTER - SCOPE SIGNED AT SALE, HANDOFF FORMALISED, REPETITION AUTOMATED SIGNED + SCOPED BUILD REVIEW AUTO-INVOICE PAID TOTAL CYCLE 32 DAYS
Most of a ninety-day cycle is not work - it is waiting. Collecting in thirty days instead of ninety means the business finances its own growth.
Service 09

Financial control, cash flow & working capital

Knowing the number before it becomes a problem.

Profitable businesses fail on cash, not on profit. Revenue is recognised on invoice, costs are paid on schedule, and the gap between the two is where growing companies quietly run out of room - usually at the exact moment things are going well.

This installs the financial control layer: a rolling thirteen-week cash forecast with defined trigger points, a receivables process that escalates on ageing rather than on memory, vendor terms renegotiated against your own payment cycle, and an overhead benchmark that tells you whether the cost base is proportionate before you add to it.

  • Rolling 13-week cash forecast with scenario triggers
  • Receivables ageing process with automated escalation
  • Vendor and supplier terms review against your collection cycle
  • Overhead benchmark and fixed-cost structure analysis
  • Working capital cycle measurement and reduction plan
  • Monthly financial review pack, board-ready
The month you run out is visible in week threeCash forecast model
13-WEEK ROLLING CASH POSITION ₹80L₹40L₹0 MINIMUM SAFE BALANCE WEEK 9 - BREACH WEEK 5 - FORECAST FLAGS IT Four weeks to act ACTIONS TAKEN IN THE WINDOW Collections pushed · spend deferred W1W5 W9W13 WITHOUT A FORECAST, WEEK 9 ARRIVES WITHOUT WARNING - AND BECOMES AN EMERGENCY LOAN
Profitable businesses fail on cash, not on profit. A rolling forecast converts a crisis into a scheduled decision you make four weeks early.
Service 10

Retention, expansion & readiness

The cheapest growth is already inside the business.

Closing is the beginning of revenue, not the end of the sale. Account management is structured with defined review rhythms and health scoring, so a deteriorating relationship is identified while it can still be saved rather than discovered at renewal. Expansion paths are mapped to each package tier, and a systematic referral mechanic converts satisfied clients into a predictable acquisition channel at a fraction of paid cost.

With the existing book compounding, attention turns outward: whether the operating model can be replicated, what must be documented before it can be, which region or market to enter first, and whether statutory, contractual and intellectual property positions are strong enough to survive scrutiny during expansion or due diligence.

  • Account health scoring on usage, engagement, payment and sentiment
  • Quarterly business review structure and monthly reporting format
  • Expansion and cross-sell path mapped for every tier
  • Referral engine - ask timing, incentive design and attribution
  • Replication readiness - what must be documented before scaling
  • Regional and international entry sequencing with defined criteria
  • Statutory, contract and intellectual property gap review
The cheapest revenue you will ever sellCohort model
100 CLIENTS WON THIS YEAR - WHERE THEY ARE IN 12 MONTHS NO RETENTION SYSTEM 86 churned or dormant 14 repeat 0 referrals - nobody asked NEXT YEAR STARTS BY RE-BUYING 86 CUSTOMERS AT FULL ACQUISITION COST WITH HEALTH SCORING, REVIEWS & A REFERRAL MECHANIC 62 churned 38 retained - 12 expanded a tier 13 new clients from referral ACQUISITION COST OF THOSE 13 REFERRALS ₹0 in media - roughly ₹9.4L saved
Closing is the beginning of revenue, not the end of the sale. The book you already own is the cheapest and most predictable channel you have - and almost nobody operates it deliberately.
How an engagement runs

Six phases, each with a signed-off output

Nothing moves forward until the previous phase has produced something you can hold.

01

Scope

The free diagnostic identifies the constraint. We agree which service areas are active, what measures define success, and what is deliberately out of scope.

OutputScoped engagement with agreed measures
02

Architect

The target decomposed, the buyer defined, the offer engineered and priced - on paper, before anything is built.

OutputRevenue roadmap, ICP, pricing structure
03

Build

Processes documented, systems configured, templates and playbooks written, tracking and automation put in place.

OutputLive systems, documents, SOPs
04

Activate

The team is trained in their own roles, the review cadence starts, and it runs with me in the room until it holds without me.

OutputTrained team, running cadence
05

Optimise

Weekly review against live data, with pricing, messaging and process iterated on evidence rather than opinion.

OutputImproved conversion, margin, cycle time
06

Hand over

Documentation transferred, an internal owner certified, and a governance checklist so nothing degrades after I leave.

OutputDocumentation pack, certified owner
Separate services

Four delivery arms, priced on their own

Consulting rebuilds the commercial model. These execute against it - engaged independently, or alongside a consulting mandate.

Investment

Four tiers, priced by active areas

₹70,000 to ₹1,50,000 per month. Each tier names the exact areas it activates.

Tier 01 · ₹50,000/mo

10X Ignite - 2 service areas

One binding constraint solved properly, with a monthly working session and documented outputs.

Tier 02 · ₹85,000/mo

10X Build - 4 service areas

Positioning, pricing and sales process rebuilt, with fortnightly sessions and team training.

Tier 03 · ₹1,25,000/mo

10X Scale - 7 service areas

Front end and back end together, weekly review run by me, Revenue OS deployed.

Tier 04 · ₹1,50,000/mo

10X Dominate - all 10 areas

The full programme including retention engines, compliance readiness and expansion sequencing.

Whether this is a fit

Strong fit

  • An established business with paying customers, moving beyond founder-led selling
  • The product works and demand exists, but revenue is unpredictable
  • Margin is unclear, or growing has not improved profit
  • Two or three people currently carry the entire number
  • Leadership willing to enforce process, not merely approve it
  • Preparing to expand into a new region, segment or market

Not a fit

  • Looking for lead lists or an outsourced calling vendor
  • Expecting results without changing how the business operates
  • No product-market fit yet - structure cannot manufacture demand
  • Wanting a strategy document with no intention of implementing it
  • A timeline shorter than one full sales cycle
  • Unwilling to let anyone see the real numbers
Questions

What people ask before the first call

Do I have to take all ten services?

No. The free diagnostic exists precisely to identify which two or three areas are the binding constraint. Most engagements start narrow and expand only after the first area produces a visible result and the team trusts the process.

How is this different from a marketing or sales agency?

An agency executes a channel. I diagnose the whole commercial model and rebuild the parts that decide whether any channel can work. If your positioning is unclear and your pricing is wrong, better advertising simply loses money faster. Where execution is needed, service 05 and service 07 deliver it - but only after the model underneath is sound.

How quickly do results appear?

Structural fixes - pricing, qualification, response time, scope discipline - usually move numbers within the first sales cycle. Compounding effects from capability building and retention systems take two to three cycles. The diagnostic will tell you which category your main constraint falls into before you commit.

Do you work alongside our existing leadership?

Yes. On most engagements I work through the existing sales or business head rather than around them - building the system, coaching them to run it, then stepping back. Where no such role exists, I hold the function directly until we hire one and then train the successor.

Can we keep our current agency?

Often the right answer. Service 04 sets demand strategy and can be handed to whoever executes it. Service 05 exists for businesses that would rather have strategy and execution under one accountability, not because your existing agency is necessarily the problem.

What happens when the engagement ends?

Documentation is transferred, an internal owner is certified on every system, and you receive a governance checklist covering what needs auditing and how often. The measure of success is that nothing degrades after I leave.

Diagnosis first.
Always.

Run the free Revenue Stress Test and you will have a scored view of the business in twelve minutes, along with the package matched to your result. Bring that to a call and the conversation starts from evidence rather than from a pitch.